Quit Thinking In Terms Of Proof, You Fucking Fuckers – Start Thinking In Terms Of Probabilities!

I hate these motherfuckers who are always thinking in terms of proof. You motherfuckers who do that need to cut that shit out! That pisses me the fuck off!!! A lot of times it’s pseudoskeptic fucks doing this kind of shit, and I think that they’re the worst offenders, but they are not the only ones who do it, to be fair. Motherfuckers put up the word “proof,” which they, and most other people, view as having a high bar before they will accept something as being proven. Then, these evil fucks will start thinking of things in terms of “proof” versus “not proof.” That’s a bunch of bullshit! First of all, I don’t think that anything is ever totally proven or disproven. Things can change, and reasoning or evidence that was not thought about could change things. Also, many of these fucks will use this “proof” versus “not proof” way of thinking to be misleading, even if  they don’t realize it. (though some DO realize it) I mean, if a fucker is 80% confident that statement A is true, they might still say that it has “not been proven,” and they won’t even mention that they are 80% percent confident. That’s misleading as fuck, and it pisses me the fuck off!!! These motherfuckers need to start thinking, and talking, and posting, with respect to probability, instead of this “proof versus not proof” bullshit! CUT THAT SHIT OUT, YOU STUPID FUCKS!!!

Oh, yeah, by the way, I think that a good, real-life example of evil pseudoskeptic fucks doing this kind of evil shit is the Natasha Deminka case, where this chick claimed that she had the ability to see inside the human body, evil pseudoskeptic fucks “tested” her, and, even though she did quit well, they still said that she failed because of the fact that she did not reach the pseudoskeptics’ high bar for “proof.” These pseudoskeptic fucks were being deceptive by using the “proof versus not proof” way of thinking. That would not have happened if they had accurately reported on her abilities with respect to probability. Then, everybody would have seen that, although she did not reach the pseudoskeptic fucks’ high bar of “proof,” she did  do a very good job. FUCK YOU EVIL PSEUDOSKEPTIC FUCKS FOR DOING THIS KIND OF SHIT!!! If you want more information about these evil pseudoskeptic fucks and what they did to Natasha Deminka, check out this link:

http://www.skepticalinvestigations.org/Demkinafile/Barrington_scientists.html

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s